Juvenile court operates as a unique entity, where the Constitution still holds sway, yet the rules and language differ significantly from adult court. Our conversation begins by examining these distinctions, such as the use of terms like "adjudicated a delinquent minor" instead of "convicted of a crime." This seemingly minor difference in terminology can have profound implications on a young person's future, particularly when filling out job applications.

We explore the concept of bind overs, where juveniles may be tried as adults for certain offenses. This raises important questions about the fairness and effectiveness of such practices, especially given the understanding that adolescent brains are not fully developed until their mid-twenties. The discussion highlights the tension between society's desire for justice and the need for rehabilitation and understanding when dealing with young offenders.

Throughout the episode, we emphasize the importance of recognizing juveniles as individuals with rights, as affirmed by landmark cases like Tinker vs. Des Moines. The podcast serves as a reminder that while juveniles may lack certain legal privileges, such as a jury trial, they retain fundamental constitutional protections.

Top Moments

(00:00) Introduction

(01:30) Juvenile Law Basics

(Robbiey) Constitutional Rights in Juvenile Court

(08:45) Terminology Differences

(15:00) The Concept of Bind Overs

(25:00) Mandatory vs. Discretionary Bind Overs

(35:00) Real-World Implications

(45:00) Closing Thoughts

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2024 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

We revisit the DUI360 series, a comprehensive approach to DUI defense. Discover the intricacies of the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test, often misunderstood by many. Learn how this involuntary eye test works, its accuracy, and why you might want to refuse it during a field sobriety test.

Key Moments

(02:00) What is DUI360?

(04:30) Understanding the Eye Test

(08:45) The Science Behind Nystagmus

(12:00) Legal Rights and Refusal

(16:30) Defense Strategies

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2024 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law

Are you dealing with a neighbor dispute over property Boundaries?

This episode's question comes from a listener about neighbor disputes over property boundaries. Steve talks about the complexities of handling fence boundary disagreements, the implications of prescriptive easements, and adverse possession. Discover practical legal advice and whether it's worth the hassle to go to court over a mere 16 inches of land.

01:30 Neighbor Disputes and Legal Implications

05:15 Prescriptive Easements and Adverse Possession

10:00 Practical Advice and Legal Counsel

Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast!

Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com.

Recorded at Channel 511.

Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere.

Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts.

He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience.

Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention.

For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense.

Copyright 2024 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law