worst psychlogical advice

For a book that goes so far into psychlogical theory it's advice is the worst I've ever heard. After they know that Jim is a murdering psycho who is a constantly endangering his wife and kid they talk about how they shouldn't do anything because it could make him angry instead of realising that if they wait to long there won't be anyone left to free, they sound exactly the same as the beaten wife, but she has an excuse to give up they do not. Why they don't start planing how to free the victims the moment they realise how dangerous and unstable Jim is I don't understand, they have the means to free them and even hide them from him, they're friends with at least one policeman, they have money and are much more integrated into the community than Jim. I just don't get why they can't find a way to help the victims, I can see so many possibilities and it's clear that a therapy won't ever help if they stay with Jim. As long as the mother doesn't want to go back to Jim it would be easy, they could even move them around, put them in a safe house they got with their own money, then spy on Jim as coyote and find as much proof for illegal stuff to put him into jail. And this was my first thought, why the hell didn't the protagonist just bring a camera and microphone to the house to get proof against the guy, it seemed to be very easy to sneak there and observe them.

Sie haben diese Rezension bewertet.

Wir haben Ihre Meldung erhalten und werden die Rezension prüfen.